GC MS Drug Test, Drug Test News, Pass a Urine Drug Test, Pass a drug test. Call 1-888-420-6556.
We are here to serve you! We look forward to exceeding your expectations!
We sell all Total Body and Same Day Body Cleansers and offer reliable overnight shipping @ PassYourDrugTest.com


 

 

 

 

To purchase products or request more information, call us at:

This is a Toll Free Call.

We Accept Visa, Mastercard, Discover and American Express!

 

 

Drug Testing News

HOW GC-MS Drug Testing WORKS


by Nicholas Coffey, Chemist

People who routinely rely on drug testing results are largely unaware of the
problems inherent in such tests. If the tests are used in a holistic
informational context, with other indications of abuse being considered they
may be more useful. However, reliance on GC-MS as 100% reliable is
misguided at best. Why? The best way to appreciate the limitations of the
GC-MS is to understand how it works.

The GC-MS is a hybrid of two technologies: the gas chromatograph and the
mass spectrometer. The gas chromatograph is a device for separating a
mixture of compounds according to their relative attractions to a substrate
material called an adsorbent. Typically the adsorbent is silica or alumina
gel lining in column inside the machine. The sample is injected into a
stream of carrier gas inside the machine where it goes through the column
which is heated by an oven. The separations occur on the column. The
stream of compounds, now, in theory separated, pass by a detector which
causes a signal to be emitted. This signal is usually picked by and
electro-mechanical device to record it. It's important to understand
that what is recorded is the relative retention times of the compounds on
the column in the machine. There is no information about the chemical
structure of the materials being recorded.

After separation on the column in the GC, the materials then pass through to
the mass spectrometer. In this machine the materials are destroyed in the
presence of a strong magnetic field. Fragments of the materials are then
analyzed according to their molecular weight. The results are compared
against databases which are built on the statistical likelihood of
particular compounds to fragment in specific ways. Again, there is never a
direct analysis of the material. The precision and accuracy of the results
depend on the quality of the database used.

Thus false positives for opiates are common in patients taking certain
antibiotics because the drug labs don't consider this source of false
positives. Patients taking levofloxicin and ofloxacin were given false
positive results four out of five times in tests of the method and patients
using Cipro were attributed with false positives one in five times (JAMA,
12/26/01). The problem was that the fragmentation patterns of antibiotics
weren't in the databases so the next most likely match was
automatically picked by the software.

There are no laboratories currently operating outside of academic settings
that have GC-MS operated by chemists with sufficient experience to
analyze unknowns or unfamiliar compounds. Small wonder that. It takes a
minimum of four years of graduate analytical chemistry and two years of
medical school training in toxicology to gain the experience required to
process pharmaceutical unknowns by GC-MS. Drug labs are typically operated
by technicians who are supervised by a chemist or engineer with a BS degree.
While these personnel are well trained enough to handle routine compounds
found in the databases there shouldn't be any question as to the
possibility of false positives emerging from these settings. A certain
mystique has arisen about the GC-MS method among drug test providers and
employee supervisors. The widespread belief in the infallibility of the
method is wholly unjustified.
Our Note:
Wonderful, at last someone telling the truth, wonder who got him upset enough 
to do this. The gentlemen who invented the GC-MS is from the UK, it was 
invented for the military, pilots and public servants, however, the insurance 
companies got wind of it and then it trickled down to the private sector. 
Parliament was going to pass drug testing in the UK and the inventor went 
back and told them about the accuracy and asked that they not do to their 
people what the American Government has done to us, he made himself a billionaire at our expense.